Burmese vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 413,704,618 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 55.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $61,759, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($54,559 compared to $52,297, a difference of 4.3%), and per capita income ($52,005 compared to $49,894, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $72,288, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $43,648, a difference of 2.9%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $119,800, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.96%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.7%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.3%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 14.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.6%), male disability (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.5%).