Immigrants from Scotland vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,992,363 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.164% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 164.0 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $72,288, a difference of 8.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $57,078, a difference of 8.4%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,893 compared to $49,894, a difference of 0.0%), median male earnings ($61,220 compared to $61,759, a difference of 0.88%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $52,297, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.3% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (49.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.33%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%).