Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,347,345 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 180.3 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $72,288, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $117,750, a difference of 13.9%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $119,800, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $49,894, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $43,648, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.5%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.5%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.67%).