Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Bhutanese
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,487,071 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 15.8 Bhutanese.
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $61,759, a difference of 26.5%), householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $72,288, a difference of 24.2%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $49,894, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $57,078, a difference of 4.4%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $43,648, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $109,520, a difference of 12.0%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 70.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 164.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 80.1%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 51.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 71.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 65.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Tsimshian vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 106.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 70.0%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.6%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Bhutanese |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |