Lumbee vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,676,180 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 8.3 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($54,644 compared to $100,151, a difference of 83.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $109,520, a difference of 81.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $117,750, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 26.5%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $43,648, a difference of 34.3%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $52,297, a difference of 41.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 153.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 149.4%), and receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 148.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 68.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 70.7%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 86.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 105.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 80.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 72.9%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (63.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 120.9%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 113.1%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 85.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 79.4%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.7%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.2%), cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%).