Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,934 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 63.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $72,288, a difference of 38.8%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $119,800, a difference of 35.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,108 compared to $117,750, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $57,078, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $43,648, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 87.1%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 73.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.8%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.9%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 70.8%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 70.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%).