Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,986,733 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 101.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $72,288, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $57,078, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $117,750, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,983 compared to $49,894, a difference of 0.18%), median earnings ($52,514 compared to $52,297, a difference of 0.41%), and median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $43,648, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.87%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 55.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.2%), male disability (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).