Immigrants from Guyana vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,378,668 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $117,750, a difference of 30.6%), and median family income ($92,513 compared to $119,800, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $57,078, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $43,648, a difference of 7.0%), and median earnings ($45,204 compared to $52,297, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 83.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 62.4%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 55.3%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 33.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.2%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 238.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 129.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 97.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 29.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 68.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 97.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 74.0%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.4%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.020%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.5%).