Nonimmigrants vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,528,480 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Nonimmigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nonimmigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nonimmigrants corresponds to a decrease of 8.4 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($79,429 compared to $89,100, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($57,426 compared to $64,416, a difference of 12.2%), and per capita income ($40,669 compared to $45,220, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.0%), median male earnings ($52,170 compared to $55,712, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($44,117 compared to $47,617, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.1%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 16.2%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.080%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.18%), ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and high school diploma (89.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nonimmigrants and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.4%).