Moroccan vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,691,072 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to a decrease of 23.0 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $64,416, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($41,872 compared to $40,297, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,256 compared to $53,680, a difference of 0.79%), per capita income ($45,854 compared to $45,220, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $55,712, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and family households (61.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.1%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 55.3%), no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 50.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 37.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and bachelor's degree (40.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.44%).