Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,270,067 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $97,623, a difference of 12.7%), and per capita income ($40,339 compared to $45,220, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $40,297, a difference of 2.5%), median earnings ($45,030 compared to $47,617, a difference of 5.8%), and median male earnings ($51,310 compared to $55,712, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.8%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.72%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.0%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.1%).