Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Costa Ricans

Immigrants from Oceania

Average
Average
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Costa Rican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,191,695 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Immigrants from Oceania.
Costa Rican Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $64,416, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $55,712, a difference of 2.6%), and per capita income ($44,090 compared to $45,220, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $103,705, a difference of 0.90%), householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,090
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Good
$103,989
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,262
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Average
$46,645
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,279
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,622
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,106
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,565
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,779
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,638
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Average
25.6%

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Average
12.3%
Families
Average
9.0%
Good
8.7%
Males
Good
11.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Good
13.3%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.0%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Good
11.4%

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
82.1%

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 6.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.92%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.7%
Excellent
30.6%

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.9%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.3%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.4%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
46.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.7%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Good
1.9%

Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricCosta RicanImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Fair
2.5%