Arapaho vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,845,406 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.921. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.536% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 535.9 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,220, a difference of 39.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,705, a difference of 36.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $97,623, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $64,416, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,680, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 76.8%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 55.3%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 154.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 141.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 137.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 54.1%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.29, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 58.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.1%).