Asian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,024,023 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $97,623, a difference of 15.4%), median male earnings ($63,827 compared to $55,712, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $103,705, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $64,416, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 21.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.36%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.8%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.81%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.2%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.1%).