Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,942,569 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $53,680, a difference of 5.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $64,416, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($43,852 compared to $45,220, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,010 compared to $89,100, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $97,623, a difference of 0.30%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $103,705, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.67%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.0%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (67.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.61%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.4%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).