Icelander vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,455,900 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 36.1 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $64,416, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($44,987 compared to $45,220, a difference of 0.52%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $55,712, a difference of 0.54%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $103,705, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.43%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.25%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.10%).