Alsatian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,642,830 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 34.9 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $53,680, a difference of 9.0%), median household income ($85,053 compared to $89,100, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($47,284 compared to $45,220, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $40,297, a difference of 0.59%), median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $55,712, a difference of 0.60%), and median earnings ($47,023 compared to $47,617, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.5%), single male poverty (15.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.2%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.5%), family households with children (25.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.36%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (45.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.0%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.2%).