Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from Oceania

Average
Average
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,868,043 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Immigrants from Oceania.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $55,712, a difference of 14.1%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $45,220, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $64,416, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $97,623, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $40,297, a difference of 1.9%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Average
25.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.3%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Average
12.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Good
13.1%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Good
11.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 155.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 80.4%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Average
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Excellent
5.3%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
82.1%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Excellent
30.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.3%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.6%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 107.4%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.8%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%