Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Oceania
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,868,043 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Immigrants from Oceania.
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $55,712, a difference of 14.1%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $45,220, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $64,416, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $97,623, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $40,297, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Excellent $45,220 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Excellent $106,453 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Exceptional $89,100 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Excellent $47,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Good $55,712 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Good $40,297 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $53,680 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Excellent $97,623 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Excellent $103,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Exceptional $64,416 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Average 25.6% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 40.3%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Good 8.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Good 28.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Good 11.4% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 155.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 80.4%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 37.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 82.1% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Excellent 30.6% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Fair 37.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.9% |
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 107.4%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.8%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |