Immigrants from Egypt vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,214,729 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Egypt communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Egypt within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Egypt corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($59,925 compared to $55,712, a difference of 7.6%), median earnings ($50,901 compared to $47,617, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $40,297, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,299 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($54,239 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.0%), and wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.2%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.2%), bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.0%).