Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Immigrants from Oceania

Fair
Average
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,726,817 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.842. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.416% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 416.3 Immigrants from Oceania.
Potawatomi Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,576 compared to $89,100, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $103,705, a difference of 22.6%), and median family income ($88,265 compared to $106,453, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.1%), median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $55,712, a difference of 14.2%), and median earnings ($41,288 compared to $47,617, a difference of 15.3%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Average
25.6%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 27.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and single female poverty (25.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.5%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Good
11.4%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Females
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.3%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
82.1%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 18.5%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Excellent
30.6%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.6%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.8%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and male disability (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%