Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,577,494 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 184.4 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $64,416, a difference of 13.1%), median family income ($95,647 compared to $106,453, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $103,705, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $40,297, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($45,198 compared to $47,617, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.1%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.55%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.1%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.55%).