Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Aleuts

Immigrants from Oceania

Fair
Average
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Aleut Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,456,017 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 7.6 Immigrants from Oceania.
Aleut Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $55,712, a difference of 8.9%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and median family income ($98,702 compared to $106,453, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $64,416, a difference of 2.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $103,705, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($38,719 compared to $40,297, a difference of 4.1%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,210
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,702
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,446
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,241
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,168
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,719
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,377
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,370
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,052
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,708
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Average
25.6%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 24.1%), single female poverty (25.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Average
12.3%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Good
8.7%
Males
Poor
11.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Average
13.4%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.9%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Good
11.4%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 52.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.4%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.8%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.2%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.91%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
82.1%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 28.7%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.6%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.3%
Excellent
30.6%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.0%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.6%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.6%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricAleutImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.8%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.4%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Fair
2.5%