Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Oceania
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,084,981 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 60.1 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $97,623, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $89,100, a difference of 14.9%), and wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $40,297, a difference of 6.1%), median earnings ($43,416 compared to $47,617, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $64,416, a difference of 10.3%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,529 | Excellent $45,220 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $93,593 | Excellent $106,453 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $77,559 | Exceptional $89,100 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $43,416 | Excellent $47,617 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,201 | Good $55,712 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,965 | Good $40,297 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,916 | Exceptional $53,680 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,254 | Excellent $97,623 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,293 | Excellent $103,705 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,375 | Exceptional $64,416 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Average 12.3% |
| Families | Tragic 10.1% | Good 8.7% |
| Males | Tragic 12.7% | Average 11.2% |
| Females | Tragic 15.2% | Average 13.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Average 13.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Good 16.9% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Good 15.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Good 20.7% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Good 28.7% |
| Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Excellent 10.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 5.5% | Average 5.3% |
| Females | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Poor 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Good 7.5% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Excellent 65.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Poor 79.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 37.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Exceptional 76.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 84.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.0%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Good 46.9% |
| Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.0% | Average 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Good 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.54%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Excellent 9.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Excellent 90.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 57.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.6%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Poor 97.1% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Poor 96.8% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 95.7% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Poor 94.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Poor 93.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Fair 90.9% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Fair 88.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Fair 85.5% |
| College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Average 65.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.0% | Average 59.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Fair 45.8% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Fair 37.3% |
| Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Fair 14.7% |
| Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Good 4.6% |
| Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Fair 11.8% |
| Males | Good 11.1% | Fair 11.4% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Good 12.1% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Fair 11.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Poor 24.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 48.0% |
| Vision | Fair 2.2% | Average 2.2% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Good 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 2.5% |