British vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,401,093 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.852. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 71.1 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.3%), and median male earnings ($57,890 compared to $55,712, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($88,914 compared to $89,100, a difference of 0.21%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,359 compared to $97,623, a difference of 0.75%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.76%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.51%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.4%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%).