Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Oceania

Average
Average
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,274,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 86.3 Immigrants from Oceania.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,193 compared to $89,100, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.4%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $55,712, a difference of 2.7%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $45,220, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $47,617, a difference of 4.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Average
25.6%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.7%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.97%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Average
12.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Good
8.7%
Males
Average
11.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Average
13.4%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Good
11.4%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.39%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.1%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.9%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.85%), family households (63.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Excellent
30.6%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.63%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.6%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.5%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and high school diploma (90.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 0.060%), associate's degree (45.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.57%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Good
1.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%