Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,568,811 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to an increase of 63.8 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $55,712, a difference of 9.6%), per capita income ($49,463 compared to $45,220, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($51,337 compared to $47,617, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.070%), householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.4%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.5%), male poverty (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.1%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.4%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.3%).