White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,180,194 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 3.0 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $64,416, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($82,029 compared to $89,100, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $55,712, a difference of 3.3%), median earnings ($45,197 compared to $47,617, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $103,705, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.9%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.080%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.8%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 38.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.5%).