Burmese vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,708,826 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $103,705, a difference of 17.1%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $55,712, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $97,623, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,680, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $64,416, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.0%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.4%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.6%).