Fijian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Fijian
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Fijians
Immigrants from China
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Fijian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,884,210 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.116% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 116.4 Immigrants from China.
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $119,756, a difference of 49.8%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $54,264, a difference of 47.9%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $67,353, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $69,174, a difference of 21.8%).
Income Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,690 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,387 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,205 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,193 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,607 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,114 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,132 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,956 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,187 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,768 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Poor 26.7% |
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Poverty Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.8% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.2% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.1% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.6% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 173.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 129.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 105.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.7% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.4% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.7% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.1% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Fijian vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 52.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%).
Disability Metric | Fijian | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |