Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Immigrants from China

Average
Good
6,212
SOCIAL INDEX
59.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
160th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,195,888 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to a decrease of 17.8 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,819 compared to $119,756, a difference of 34.8%), median household income ($79,888 compared to $105,335, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,288 compared to $122,178, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $57,931, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $46,972, a difference of 20.8%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,278
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,432
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$79,888
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,600
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,869
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,886
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,565
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,819
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,288
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,986
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.8%
Poor
26.7%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.3%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 34.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.5%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.8%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.1%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.1%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 84.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 68.2%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.2%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Excellent
93.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.3%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
3.1%

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 30.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Bosnia and HerzegovinaImmigrants from China
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Fair
3.1%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%