Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cheyenne

Immigrants from China

Poor
Good
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Cheyenne Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,786,677 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.256% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to a decrease of 255.9 Immigrants from China.
Cheyenne Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $122,178, a difference of 60.0%), median household income ($66,974 compared to $105,335, a difference of 57.3%), and median family income ($81,385 compared to $125,540, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 14.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,096 compared to $69,174, a difference of 27.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $57,931, a difference of 28.0%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,276
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$81,385
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,974
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,062
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,673
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,275
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,152
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,362
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,096
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Poor
26.7%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 108.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (26.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 95.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (25.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 91.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.9%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.1%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.6%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 133.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 113.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 92.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
8.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.3%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
10.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.8%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.3%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 67.5%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 59.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.47 compared to 3.23, a difference of 7.6%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.47
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.2%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.6%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Poor
6.0%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 94.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 89.5%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 88.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.40%), 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and 9th grade (94.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.6%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.7%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
3.1%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.7%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.2%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%