Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 274,801,757 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.128% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to a decrease of 128.2 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,257 compared to $119,756, a difference of 10.6%), median household income ($96,743 compared to $105,335, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $57,931, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($54,557 compared to $54,264, a difference of 0.54%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $69,174, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.0%), poverty (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.4%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.6%), currently married (46.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 17.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.2%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.8%).