Ethiopian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,453,520 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.109% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 109.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.7%), wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 22.2%), and median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $67,353, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $69,174, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $57,931, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $46,972, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.040%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.4%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (61.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 31.4%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%).