Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,201,488 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to a decrease of 5.5 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,969 compared to $119,756, a difference of 33.1%), median household income ($80,972 compared to $105,335, a difference of 30.1%), and per capita income ($42,563 compared to $54,264, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $69,174, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $57,931, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 34.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and single male poverty (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%), poverty (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 33.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 34.8%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and currently married (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 122.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 64.5%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 77.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 49.0%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%).