Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,056,615 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.514. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.128% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 127.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,124 compared to $119,756, a difference of 18.4%), per capita income ($46,938 compared to $54,264, a difference of 15.6%), and median household income ($91,887 compared to $105,335, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $69,174, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $122,178, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.72%), married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 79.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.5%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.1%).