Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 407,328,896 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to a decrease of 20.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,616 compared to $119,756, a difference of 16.7%), median household income ($92,029 compared to $105,335, a difference of 14.5%), and median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $46,972, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $69,174, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 73.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 56.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 50.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).