Bolivian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,991,082 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Bolivian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bolivians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.072% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bolivians corresponds to a decrease of 71.8 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,066 compared to $67,353, a difference of 10.3%), per capita income ($49,526 compared to $54,264, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,372 compared to $119,756, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.36%), householder income under 25 years ($58,506 compared to $57,931, a difference of 0.99%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,871 compared to $122,178, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), single mother poverty (25.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.48%), married-couple households (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 76.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.5%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (19.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 10th grade (93.2% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.6%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.3%).