Immigrants from Western Africa vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,246,146 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Western Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.487. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.061% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Africa corresponds to a decrease of 61.5 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,676 compared to $119,756, a difference of 39.8%), per capita income ($40,294 compared to $54,264, a difference of 34.7%), and median family income ($94,638 compared to $125,540, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,621 compared to $57,931, a difference of 16.8%), median female earnings ($39,351 compared to $46,972, a difference of 19.4%), and wage/income gap (22.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 53.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 44.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 61.3%), births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 45.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (49.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 79.1%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 68.0%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.2%).