Immigrants from Bulgaria vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,850,829 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Bulgaria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.564. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bulgaria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.529% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bulgaria corresponds to an increase of 528.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,423 compared to $119,756, a difference of 15.8%), median household income ($93,148 compared to $105,335, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,379 compared to $122,178, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,379 compared to $69,174, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,305 compared to $57,931, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.32%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.0%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bulgaria and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.3%).