Hispanic or Latino vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,116,644 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.584. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hispanics or Latinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hispanics or Latinos corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,688 compared to $54,264, a difference of 52.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,515 compared to $119,756, a difference of 48.7%), and median family income ($85,647 compared to $125,540, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,279 compared to $57,931, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,832 compared to $69,174, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 65.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 59.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 56.4%), births to unmarried women (37.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 53.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.2%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 66.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 134.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 112.3%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hispanic or Latino and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.4%).