Barbadian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,091,547 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.288% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 287.9 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 40.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $122,178, a difference of 35.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,565 compared to $119,756, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $57,931, a difference of 11.0%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $46,972, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $56,638, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 72.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 51.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (17.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.0%), male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 56.2%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 49.8%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%), family households (62.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 72.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 44.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 91.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 62.6%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 7.7%).