Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,226,681 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 173.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,260 compared to $119,756, a difference of 55.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $122,178, a difference of 54.3%), and median household income ($68,412 compared to $105,335, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $57,931, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,475 compared to $69,174, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 71.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 64.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 52.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 55.6%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 43.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.13%), family households (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 131.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 117.2%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 101.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 79.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%).