Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,198,667 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.258% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 257.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $119,756, a difference of 10.1%), median household income ($96,378 compared to $105,335, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $122,178, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $57,931, a difference of 3.6%), and per capita income ($52,044 compared to $54,264, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.18%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.32%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 6.6%).