Dutch vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 290,308,413 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,081 compared to $119,756, a difference of 28.7%), per capita income ($42,605 compared to $54,264, a difference of 27.4%), and median household income ($82,971 compared to $105,335, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,265 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,539 compared to $69,174, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and single male poverty (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 40.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.8%), births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 121.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 79.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.68%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 74.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.41%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.3%).