Arab vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,529,249 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 24.0 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $119,756, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $105,335, a difference of 19.2%), and per capita income ($45,662 compared to $54,264, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.32%), householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $69,174, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $57,931, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.1%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.38%), ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.4%).