Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from China
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,404,333 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.152% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 151.8 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $119,756, a difference of 48.7%), per capita income ($37,464 compared to $54,264, a difference of 44.8%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $67,353, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $69,174, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $57,931, a difference of 14.3%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Exceptional $54,264 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Exceptional $125,540 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Exceptional $105,335 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Exceptional $56,638 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Exceptional $67,353 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Exceptional $46,972 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Exceptional $57,931 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Exceptional $119,756 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Exceptional $122,178 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Exceptional $69,174 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Poor 26.7% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 42.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Males | Tragic 12.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
| Females | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Average 20.2% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 26.1% |
| Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Excellent 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.5% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.2% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Average 11.6% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Good 17.5% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Fair 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.5% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 5.2% |
| Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 29.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Excellent 65.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Tragic 31.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Tragic 71.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Average 84.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| Family Households | Average 64.2% | Excellent 64.7% |
| Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Average 27.4% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.9%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Tragic 84.9% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 129.2%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 107.9%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.11%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
| Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
| Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.4% |
| 2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
| 4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
| 5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
| 6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
| 7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.0% |
| 9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
| 10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Tragic 93.2% |
| 11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Good 91.3% |
| High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Good 89.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 86.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 70.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 55.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 21.2% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 48.5%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 38.6%), and male disability (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from China |
| Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Females | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 0.96% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Exceptional 46.3% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |