Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Immigrants from China

Fair
Good
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,475,549 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Immigrants from China.
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $119,756, a difference of 45.6%), per capita income ($39,529 compared to $54,264, a difference of 37.3%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $67,353, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $69,174, a difference of 18.5%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $57,931, a difference of 20.9%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,529
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,593
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,559
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,416
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,201
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,965
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,916
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,254
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,293
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,375
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Poor
26.7%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 45.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.7%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.6%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.6%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 41.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.70%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (61.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
24.7%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 48.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.9%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 60.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.0%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
3.1%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaImmigrants from China
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%