Navajo vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,777,132 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $54,264, a difference of 86.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $119,756, a difference of 80.0%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $105,335, a difference of 78.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $57,931, a difference of 36.7%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $46,972, a difference of 42.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 140.0%), married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 139.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 132.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 46.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 50.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 52.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 116.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 105.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 108.7%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 74.8%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.23, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 60.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 134.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 128.6%), and master's degree (9.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 124.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.28%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 78.0%), hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.6%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.9%).