Central American vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 430,776,663 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.591. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 21.6 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,560 compared to $54,264, a difference of 40.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $119,756, a difference of 40.6%), and median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $67,353, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $57,931, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $69,174, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 51.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 51.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.6%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.23, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 40.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 111.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 87.7%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.4%).