Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,371,862 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $54,264, a difference of 63.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $119,756, a difference of 58.3%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $105,335, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $57,931, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $69,174, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 87.9%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 82.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 81.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 85.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 64.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 74.2%), single father households (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 133.2%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 127.6%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 113.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.13%), 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 101.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 76.0%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.4%).